If a candidate is to win an election easily, that candidate must respond to the electorate's emotional demands that the opponent either does not see or cannot act upon. Although these emotional demands are often not directly articulated by the electorate or by the candidate responding to them, they are an integral part of any landslide victory.
If a candidate is to win an election easily, that candidate must respond to the electorate's emotional demands that the opponent either does not see or cannot act upon. Although these emotional demands are often not directly articulated by the electorate or by the candidate responding to them, they are an integral part of any landslide victory.
Explanation
If a candidate is to win an election easily, that candidate must respond to the electorate's emotional demands that the opponent either does not see or cannot act upon. Although these emotional demands are often not directly articulated by the electorate or by the candidate responding to them, they are an integral part of any landslide victory.
Question:
Which one of the following conclusions can most logically be drawn from the passage above?
A. If neither candidate responds to the emotional demands of the electorate, either candidate might win in a landslide
B. If an election is closed, the emotional demands of the electorate are conflicting.
C. If a candidate responds to the emotional demands of the electorate, that candidate will have a landslide victory.
D. An election during which neither candidate responds to the emotional demands of the electorate will not result in a landslide
E. Emotional demands are the only inarticulated issue in an election
"correction answer D"